Hey Devika, before we dive into your current work, I'd like to know who Devika was before she founded Stem op een Vrouw.
Originally, I was a festival producer. I studied event management and worked on various productions such as Magneet festival, IDFA (International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam) and Roots festival; mainly focused on events within the music sector.
Originally, I was a festival producer. I studied event management and then worked for various productions such as Magneet festival, IDFA (International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam) and Roots festival; mainly for events within the music sector.
You were inspired by Suriname to set up Stem op een Vrouw. Can you tell us more about that?
I was visiting family in Suriname and decided to go to a museum for a day. That's where a 1996 flyer caught my attention. It said: 'Women make up half the population but are not represented in the National Assembly. Choose consciously, vote for a woman. ' It was a flyer from the Surinamese women's organization Women's Parliament Forum.
I took a picture of the flyer and once back in the Netherlands, the message stuck in my head. I started to wonder about the representation of women in our government. I found that the percentage of women chosen there was shockingly low, which I found mind-boggling. With the House of Representatives elections coming up, I decided to take action. As an activist in other areas, I brought a small group of people together to set up a campaign that encouraged people in the Netherlands to vote for women. This is how Stem op een Vrouw was created in 2017. Since then, our team and activities have grown enormously. I now have a team of 10 people and during election time, we work with around 30 volunteers!
Why is it important that there is a greater representation of women in politics?
Parliament must reflect the society it represents. That way, people know that their voice is being heard and that their interests are being represented. Research clearly shows that a diverse group of politicians and a good representation of women leads to better policies, not just for women, but for everyone. Plus, it's important for everyone to see politicians who look like them and who think like them. Such role models are especially important for children.
Unfortunately, the current ratio is not in balance. There are too few women to have a full impact on decisions, all of which actually matter to women, and to always consider different women's perspectives. In addition, there is a lack of visibility and diversity among women who have already been elected.
You could say that men can represent women. That's certainly true, but if you turned it around and there were only 150 women in the House of Representatives, men would probably realize that's not the right balance. Different people complement each other and representation must be balanced.
I imagine you often get criticism from men — and maybe some women too — about what you're trying to achieve. What comment or criticism would you like to debunk once and for all?
A common criticism is: “Shouldn't it be about quality rather than gender?” We have undoubtedly heard this question more than a thousand times, and we have answered it more than a thousand times. I always say: Of course, it's about quality. Why vote for someone you don't think is qualified? Our campaign isn't “Vote for a woman you don't think qualified”.
The problem often lies with the collective idea of what qualification means. This idea comes from the story that there is only one person on the list who is the best, and that is usually the candidate who is at the top. But this is not what our democracy is about. Quality in our democracy means that all the people on the list complement each other.
Our message is not to randomly choose a woman and vote for her, but to choose someone who is right for you. And if that person is a woman, you are voting for both quality and greater equality. In addition, many people voted for candidates who were at the top of the list without often really knowing what they stand for or who the other candidates are.
So yes, voting is about quality, but why does that mean you can't vote for a woman? Better representation of all people leads to better policy. Voting for a more diverse parliament improves the quality of policy.